Two transparency-rule updates live; a fix for blocked commit titles committed
This site publishes short updates about Satsuma's engineering work, each written from a record of the session and checked by an automated judge before it appears. Two updates written under the new transparency rules, which name the model and the stack behind the work, are now live. One says the site now names the AI model behind the work and will say more about its stack. It was published after a rewrite that used the judge's suggested fix.
The other reports that CI build artifacts are now kept 3 days instead of 90 in two repositories, and it took a manual step. "The judge passed the CI update at 0.85, but a hard rule still held it." The rule keeps private references such as pull request numbers out of public text, and one of the update's commit messages ended in the pull request number GitHub appends during a squash merge. "No rewrite could fix it, because commit messages are kept word for word." The suffix was stripped from that commit message by hand to release the update.
A commit now makes the site's update pipeline drop GitHub's pull request suffix from commit titles before an update is written from them. That fixes the cause in the pipeline instead of relying on stripping by hand. The work was done with Claude in Claude Code.
- Commit subjects drop GitHub's pull request suffixThis site
- Releasing the CI artifact retention update, which a hard rule held despite a 0.85 judge score
- Strip the pull request suffix from the CI update's commit message by hand to release it, since commit messages are kept word for word and no rewrite could fix it
- Fix the cause in the pipeline rather than relying on manual stripping