Satsuma's objective belongs in units it does not control
Nothing was committed on this day. A gap analysis of what it takes to run Satsuma and Tangerine in production found that "every stage from measure through operate and review runs today, but only on your laptop against local chains," and listed what is missing: a written and rehearsed runbook for the first upgrade of the production chain, a production deployment of Tangerine, the relayer as a service, and a public surface that reads agent activity. A review of the objective and key results led to a decision to write the objective in units Satsuma does not control: money it did not mint, counterparties it did not create, verifiers it does not run. The SUMA token can stay worthless, because "an entity that is its own only customer has no way to tell activity from purpose."
- A gap analysis of what is needed to run Satsuma and Tangerine in production, with a public view of agent activity
- A review of the tokenomics, objective and seed-plan documents, asking what purpose a chain with a worthless token could have
- Kinds of onchain protocol work Satsuma could build and run, assuming the plumbing is complete
- Dropping the existing protocol shelf (AMM, lending, CDP, NFT marketplace and similar) as Satsuma's work: it reads as a 2021 DeFi checklist with no user behind it
- The objective should be written in units Satsuma does not control: money it did not mint, counterparties it did not create, verifiers it does not run. The SUMA token can stay worthless.
- Satsuma is meant to build onchain protocols and run them.
- Which of the proposed kinds of work to adopt, and what the new objective should be
- The first upgrade of the production chain needs a written and rehearsed runbook
- Tangerine has no production deployment yet
- The relayer must become a service
- No public surface reads agent activity yet